4.6 Article

Analysis of long-term aerosol size distribution data from Jungfraujoch with emphasis on free tropospheric conditions, cloud influence, and air mass transport

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 120, 期 18, 页码 9459-9480

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023660

关键词

aerosol size distribution; free troposphere; boundary layer; cloud condensation nuclei; new particle formation; clouds

资金

  1. MeteoSwiss [262254, 603445]
  2. ERC [615922-BLACARAT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six years of aerosol size distribution measurements between 20 and 600nm diameters and total aerosol concentration above 10nm from March 2008 to February 2014 at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch are presented. The size distribution was found to be typically bimodal with mode diameters and widths relatively stable throughout the year and the observation period. New particle formation was observed on 14.5% of all days without a seasonal preference. Particles typically grew only into the Aitken mode and did not reach cloud condensation nucleus (CCN) sizes on the time scale of several days. Growth of preexisting particles in the Aitken mode, on average, contributed very few CCN. We concluded that the dominant fraction of CCN at Jungfraujoch originated in the boundary layer. A number of approaches were used to distinguish free tropospheric (FT) conditions and episodes with planetary boundary layer (PBL) influence. In the absence of PBL injections, the concentration of particles larger than 90nm (N-90, roughly corresponding to the CCN concentration) reached a value similar to 40cm(-3) while PBL influence caused N-90 concentrations of several hundred or even 1000cm(-3). Comparing three criteria for free tropospheric conditions, we found FT prevalence for 39% of the time with over 60% during winter and below 20% during summer. It is noteworthy that a simple criterion based on standard trace gas measurements appeared to outperform alternative approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据