4.2 Article

Dexamethasone suppression test: development of a method for simultaneous determination of cortisol and dexamethasone in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 170-176

出版社

ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/acb.2011.011004

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Dexamethasone is a synthetic glucocorticoid and is analogous to cortisol. It is used in the low-dose overnight dexamethasone suppression test (LDODST) to diagnose hypercortisolism in patients suspected to be suffering from Cushing's syndrome (CS). Measuring plasma dexamethasone in conjunction with measuring the amount of cortisol following the LDODST may allow clinicians to improve the diagnosis of CS. Methods: Plasma samples were cleaned up by solid-phase extraction before analysis. Liquid chromatographic separation was carried out under reversed-phase conditions prior to detection by tandem mass spectrometry. The analytes were determined in the presence of deuterated internal standards cortisol-d4 and dexamethasone-d4. Results: Limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 1.89 nmol/L for dexamethasone and <0.02 mu mol/L for cortisol. Recoveries of both analytes ranged from 80.2% to 114.4%. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were <15%. The concentration of dexamethasone and cortisol was determined in 62 patients after performing LDODST. Dexamethasone concentrations ranged from 3.0 to 21.5 nmol/L (median 7.4 nmol/L) for 57 of these samples. For five patients the concentration was 0.22 mu mol/L). Conclusions: A method for the simultaneous measurement of dexamethasone and cortisol in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry has been developed and validated. The method is suitable for controlling the compliance to the LDODST and for determining the cortisol plasma concentration after the test. The interpretation of LDODSTs was improved by the simultaneous determination of both analytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据