4.6 Article

An evaluation of CMAQ NO2 using observed chemistry-meteorology correlations

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023316

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST)
  2. NIH [1R21ES020232-01]
  3. NOAA Ernest F. Hollings Award
  4. Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluate nitrogen dioxide (NO2) simulations from a widely used air quality model, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, using ground-and satellite-based observations. In addition to direct comparison of modeled and measured variables, we compare the response of NO2 to meteorological conditions and the ability of the model to capture these sensitivities over the continental U.S. during winter and summer periods of 2007. This is the first study to evaluate relationships between NO2 and meteorological variables using satellite data, the first to apply these relationships for model validation, and the first to characterize variability in sensitivities over a wide geographic and temporal scope. We find boundary layer height, wind speed, temperature, and relative humidity to be the most important variables in determining near-surface NO2 variability. Consistent with earlier studies on NO2-meteorology relationships, we find that, in general, NO2 responds negatively to planetary boundary height, negatively to wind speed, and negatively to insolation. Unlike previous studies, we find a slight positive association between precipitation and NO2, and we find a consistently positive average association between temperature and NO2. CMAQ agreed with relationships observed in ground-based data from the EPA Air Quality System and the Ozone Monitoring Instrument over most regions. However, we find that the southwest U.S. is a problemare a for CMAQ, where modeled NO2 responses to insolation, boundary layer height, and other variables are at odds with the observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据