4.5 Article

Test particle comparison of heavy atomic and molecular ion distributions at Mars

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 2328-2344

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JA019221

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center under the Graduate Student Research Program [NNX10AL84H]
  2. NASA [NNX11AD80G]
  3. NSF [AST 0908311]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0908311] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0908472] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses the Mars Test Particle simulation to create virtual detections of O+, O-2(+), and CO2+ in an orbital configuration in the Mars space environment. These atomic and molecular planetary pickup ions are formed when the solar wind directly interacts with the neutral atmosphere, causing the ions to be accelerated by the background convective electric field. The subsequent ion escape is the subject of great interest, specifically with respect to which species dominates ion loss from Mars. O+ is found to be the dominant escaping ion because of the large sources of transported ions in the low-energy (<10 eV) and high-energy (>1 keV) range. O-2(+) and CO2+ are observed at these energy ranges but with much lower fluxes and are generally only found in the tail between 10 eV and 1 keV. Using individual particle traces, we reveal the origin and trajectories of the low-energy downtail O+ populations and high-energy polar O+ populations that contribute to the total escape. Comparing them against O-2(+) and CO2+ reveals that the extended hot oxygen corona contributes to source regions of high-and low-energy escaping ions. Additionally, we present results for solar minimum and maximum conditions with respect to ion fluxes and energies in order to robustly describe the physical processes controlling planetary ion distributions and atmospheric escape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据