4.5 Article

Ion heating by broadband electromagnetic waves in the magnetosheath and across the magnetopause

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
卷 118, 期 9, 页码 5579-5591

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgra.50506

关键词

Ion heating; kinetic Alfven waves; magnetosheath; boundary layer; shocks; turbulence

资金

  1. NASA [NNX09AF49G, NNX08A083G, NAS5-02099]
  2. THEMIS MODA
  3. German Ministry for Economy and Technology
  4. German Center for Aviation and Space (DLR) [50 OC 0302]
  5. NASA [NNX09AF49G, 119082] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present statistical observations demonstrating the action of broadband electromagnetic waves or structures in heating magnetosheath ions in the Earth's magnetosheath and across the magnetopause in the low-latitude boundary layer. Through the use of a generalized multicomponent fitting routine to the full 3-D distribution function, we distinguish magnetosheath ions from magnetospheric and diffuse energetic ion populations through these regions. From this approach, we find that the energy density of magnetosheath ions is well correlated with the spectral energy density of electromagnetic field fluctuations on gyro-radius scales. Through a dispersion analysis, we demonstrate that these field structures have the properties of kinetic Alfven waves. We show that the heating provided by these waves is nearly entirely perpendicular to the magnetic field and, subject to a threshold condition being exceeded, occurs at a rate that is lognormally distributed as 10(-0.31.1) eVs(-1) or on average similar to 1 eVs(-1). This rapid perpendicular heating is shown in turn to be limited by the threshold condition for anisotropy instabilities which when exceeded leads to further wave emission and the transfer of perpendicular energy to parallel particle energy. We suggest that this cycle of wave emission and heating may be expected to slow magnetosheath flow while driving irreversible changes in magnetosheath ion distributions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据