4.5 Article

The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 198-208

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.003

关键词

Research evaluation; Co-authorship; Fractional counting; Bibliometrics; Biology; Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate measurement of research productivity should take account of both the number of co-authors of every scientific work and of the different contributions of the individuals. For researchers in the life sciences, common practice is to indicate such contributions through position in the authors list. In this work, we measure the distortion introduced to bibliometric ranking lists for scientific productivity when the number of co-authors or their position in the list is ignored. The field of observation consists of all Italian university professors working in the life sciences, with scientific production examined over the period 2004-2008. The outcomes of the study lead to a recommendation against using indicators or evaluation methods that ignore the different authors' contributions to the research results. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据