4.6 Article

Variability of monsoon intracloud and intercloud microphysics over the Indian subcontinent

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023533

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Government of India, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracloud/intercloud variability of microphysical quantities during different monsoon conditions has been studied for the first time over India using in situ observations of cloud microphysics collected during the Cloud-Aerosol Interaction and Precipitation Enhancement Experiment 2009. The observations for two inland locations (Hyderabad and Bareilly) for different phases of monsoon (preonset, onset, break, and active) have been used to investigate the entrainment and mixing processes which are defined with adiabatic fraction (ADFR) <0.4 in monsoon clouds. The variation of factor k which is the ratio of cube of cloud droplet mean volume radius (r(v)) to cloud droplet effective radius (r(e)), cloud droplet number concentration (N), liquid water content (LWC), and ADFR of LWC has been used to examine the intracloud and intercloud variability of cloud microphysical properties. During the preonset (Hyderabad), clouds were undiluted (< ADFR > similar to 0.59) with moderate concentration (< N > similar to 436 cm(-3)), an average re of 8 mu m, and high value of factor k (0.774 +/- 0.035). During break monsoon (Bareilly), cloudswere diluted (< ADFR > <= 0.2) having numerous (< N > > 1000 cm(-3)) smaller droplets (r(e) <= 6 mu m) and a low value of factor k (0.678 +/- 0.064). The clouds had similar characteristics (< ADFR > similar to 0.4 having lesser (< N > similar to 300 cm(-3)) droplets with r(e) > 8 mu m) over both stations during onset/active monsoon conditions. The investigation of the variability of intracloud and intercloud microphysics revealed positive correlation between factor k and N and no detectable correlation between factor k and N, respectively, and are sensitive to ADFR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据