4.7 Article

Observations of wave energy fluxes and swash motions on a low-sloping, dissipative beach

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 118, 期 7, 页码 3651-3669

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgrc.20267

关键词

swash; infragravity; wave dissipation; wave energy fluxes; video imagery; saturation

资金

  1. (New Zealand) Foundation for Research, Science and Technology
  2. MetOcean Solutions Ltd (New Zealand)
  3. Cantabria Campus Internacional Augusto Gonzalez Linares Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Field observations of swash and ocean waves show that runup saturation at infragravity frequencies (<0.05 Hz) can occur under mild offshore energy conditions if the beach slope is sufficiently gentle. Infragravity saturation was observed for higher-frequency (>0.025-0.035 Hz) infragravity waves, where typically less than 5% of the (linear) energy flux was reflected from the beach and where, similar to the sea swell band, the swash energy was independent of offshore wave energy. The infragravity frequency range of saturation was determined by the tide, with saturation extending to lower frequencies at low tide when the local beach face slope over the concave-shaped profile was gentler. Runup was strongly dominated by infragravity frequencies, which accounted on average for 96% of the runup variance, and its energy levels were entirely consistent with strong infragravity wave dissipation observed in the surfzone, particularly when including the nonlinear contributions to the wave energy fluxes. The infragravity wave dissipation was strongly associated with breaking of sea swell waves, which abruptly decreased nonlinear transfers to infragravity frequencies and made infragravity dissipation prevail over forcing within the breaking region. Our observations show evidence of nonlinear interactions involving infragravity and high-frequency, harmonic waves and suggest that these harmonics could play a role in the wave energy balance near the shoreline on low-sloping, dissipative beaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据