4.7 Article

Arctic-scale assessment of satellite passive microwave-derived snow depth on sea ice using Operation IceBridge airborne data

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 118, 期 6, 页码 2892-2905

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgrc.20228

关键词

SD on sea ice; evaluation of satellite product; Operation IceBridge Airborne data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Snow depth on sea ice (SD) is a key geophysical variable, knowledge of which is critical for calculating the energy and mass balance budgets. Moreover, accurate knowledge of the SD distribution is important to retrieve sea-ice thicknesses from altimetry data. So far, only space-based microwave radiometers (e.g., Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System; AMSR-E) provide operational SD on seasonal sea-ice retrievals. A thorough assessment of these retrievals is needed on a large scale and on a variety of sea-ice types. Our study presents such an assessment on Arctic sea ice using NASA's airborne Operation IceBridge (OIB) SDs, retrieved from radar measurements. Between 2009 and 2011, approximate to 610 12.5 km satellite grid cells were covered by seasonal sea ice where both satellite SD retrievals and OIB data were available. Using all the available data, the difference between the AMSR-E product and the averaged OIB snow-radar-derived SD is 0.000.07 m. Satellite-derived SD was accurate in the Beaufort Sea and the Canadian Archipelago but underestimated (approximate to 0.07 m) in the Nares Strait. The RMSE between the two products ranges between 0.03 and 0.15 m. The RMSE is less than 0.06 m over a shallow snow cover (<0.20 m), in areas where satellite-retrieved ice concentrations are higher than 90%, surface smooth, and ice thicker than approximate to 0.5 m. Locally the AMSR-E algorithm can significantly underestimate SD. Several regions where the retrievals were less accurate (error >0.10 m) have been identified and related to the presence of either low ice concentration or significant fraction of multiyear ice within the grid cell that has not been flagged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据