4.7 Article

Automatic Classification of Volcano Seismic Signatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 123, 期 12, 页码 10645-10658

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JB015470

关键词

volcano seismic signal; automatic classification; machine learning; Ubinas Volcano; volcano monitoring; volcanic hazards

资金

  1. Labex OSUG@2020 (Investissements d'avenir) [ANR10 LABX56]
  2. DGA/MRIS
  3. Labex OSUG@2020 [ANR10 LABX56]
  4. IDEX
  5. project VOSICA in the framework of the Grenoble Alpes Data Institute [ANR-15-IDEX-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prediction of volcanic eruptions and the evaluation of associated risks remain a timely and unresolved issue. This paper presents a method to automatically classify seismic events linked to volcanic activity. As increased seismic activity is an indicator of volcanic unrest, automatic classification of volcano seismic events is of major interest for volcano monitoring. The proposed architecture is based on supervised classification, whereby a prediction model is built from an extensive data set of labeled observations. Relevant events should then be detected. Three steps are involved in the building of the prediction model: (i) signals preprocessing, (ii) representation of the signals in the feature space, and (iii) use of an automatic classifier to train the model. Our main contribution lies in the feature space where the seismic observations are represented by 102 features gathered from both acoustic and seismic fields. Ideally, observations are separable in the feature space, depending on their class. The architecture is tested on 109,609 seismic events that were recorded between June 2006 and September 2011 at Ubinas Volcano, Peru. Six main classes of signals are considered: long-period events, volcanic tremors, volcano tectonic events, explosions, hybrid events, and tornillos. Our model reaches 93.5%0.50% accuracy, thereby validating the presented architecture and the features used. Furthermore, we illustrate the limited influence of the learning algorithm used (i.e., random forest and support vector machines) by showing that the results remain accurate regardless of the algorithm selected for the training stage. The model is then used to analyze 6years of data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据