4.7 Article

Paleomagnetism and Geochemistry of ∼1144-Ma Lamprophyre Dikes, Northwestern Ontario: Implications for the North American Polar Wander and Plate Velocities

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 123, 期 8, 页码 6195-6214

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JB015992

关键词

Logan Loop; Midcontinent Rift; lamprophyres; paleomagnetism; geochemistry

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [EAR-1149434]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1149434] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present new paleomagnetic and geochemical data from a suite of the similar to 1144-Ma ultramafic lamprophyre dikes that outcrop in the Canadian Shield northeast of Lake Superior (Ontario, Canada). Nineteen of 22 sampled dikes yielded consistent characteristic remanent magnetization directions of normal (n = 5) and reversed (n = 14) polarity. The primary origin of characteristic remanent magnetization is bolstered by positive baked contact tests and a reversal test. The group mean direction (D = 306.4 degrees, I = 72.1 degrees, alpha(95) = 5.5 degrees, N = 19) obtained from the lamprophyre dikes is statistically indistinguishable from the group mean direction (D = 297.4 degrees, I = 65.5 degrees, alpha(95) = 8.3 degrees, N = 8) previously reported for the nearly coeval similar to 1142-Ma Abitibi dikes. The geochemistry of the lamprophyre dikes suggests strong affinity with magmas derived from ocean island basalt-type mantle sources, consistent with the mantle plume hypothesis for the formation of the similar to 1.1-Ga North American Midcontinent Rift. The similarity in age, trend, paleomagnetism, and geochemistry indicates that the lamprophyre and Abitibi dike suites represent the earliest magmatic event associated with the commencement of rifting. The combined mean direction (D = 303.1 degrees, I = 70.2 degrees, alpha(95) = 4.5 degrees, N = 27) corresponds to a paleomagnetic pole at P-lat = 55.8 degrees N, P-long = 220.0 degrees E (A(95) = 7.3 degrees). The new pole merits the highest classification on the Q-scale of paleomagnetic reliability and represents a key pole defining the North American apparent polar wander path during the late Mesoproterozoic. Combined with high-quality data from the similar to 1108-Ma Coldwell Complex, our data indicate an equatorward motion of Laurentia at 3.8 +/- 1.4 cm/year, comparable with the present-day velocities of continental plates, before switching to extremely rapid motion between similar to 1108 and similar to 1099 Ma. Plain Language Summary Similar to a magnetic tape, rocks can retain the direction of ancient Earth's magnetic field. Scientists use this record (known as paleomagnetism) to reconstruct past positions of continents and to decipher the geological history of our planet. We investigated paleomagnetism and chemical composition of the similar to 1.14 Ga-old intrusive rocks called lamprophyres exposed in Northwestern Ontario (Canada). We found that the paleomagnetic field directions recorded in lamprophyres are indistinguishable from those recorded by another similar age suite of basaltic intrusions called the Abitibi dikes, from the same area. The combined data from these rocks allowed us to constrain the position of an ancient supercontinent called Laurentia at similar to 1.14 billions of years ago more accurately than it was possible before. Our results convincingly show that, during that time, Laurentia moved with a velocity comparable to present-day plate velocities, before switching to an extremely rapid motion approximately 35 millions of years later. The lamprophyre and Abitibi rocks also share similar chemical signatures, close to those observed for ocean island basalts (e.g., Hawaii). These observations support the hypothesis that a failed ocean opening attempt called the North American Midcontinent Rift was instigated by the arrival of a hot mantle material upwelling to the Earth surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据