4.7 Article

Detection of short-term slow slip events along the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan, using GNSS data

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 118, 期 6, 页码 3112-3125

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50222

关键词

Slow slip events; GNSS; Nankai Trough; subduction zone; crustal deformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We detected short-term slow slip events (SSEs) previously observable only with tilt and strain data along the Nankai Trough, southwest Japan, using GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) data. Offsets detected in GNSS time series using Akaike's information criterion helped automatically identify 207 episodes with a motion direction opposite to that of the relative plate motion from June 1996 to January 2012. By nonlinear inversion of the detected displacement, we estimated rectangular fault models for 133 probable and 25 possible short-term SSEs over 15 years. The SSE moment magnitudes range from 5.5 to 6.3. Most SSE fault models are located in a narrow band of non-volcanic tremors on the interfaces of the subducting Philippine Sea Plate. Large SSEs (moment magnitude, M-w, 6) often occur in western and central Shikoku. The cumulative slip is distributed heterogeneously along the strike, generally decreasing eastward with the maximum slip (similar to 50 cm) in western Shikoku. No definite short-term SSEs were found in the Kii Channel, but several short-term SSEs occurred in Ise Bay. Both regions are known as tremor gaps. The local maximum of the cumulative slip fills in the tremor gap located in Ise Bay. The long-term rate of short-term SSE cumulative moment increased by threefold around 2003 in eastern Shikoku, whereas it was almost constant in other regions. Comparison with short-term SSE catalogues using tilt data suggests that both this study and previous studies missed some SSEs along the Nankai Trough. A combination of geodetic data is important in the monitoring of the spatiotemporal distribution of short-term SSEs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据