4.5 Article

Daily, biweekly, and seasonal temporal scales of pCO2 variability in two stratified Mediterranean reservoirs

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JG002317

关键词

pCO2 time-series; CO2 fluxes; reservoirs; pCO2 variability

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) through the SEDICO [CGL2007-64729]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the FPI [BES2008-008160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temporal scales of variability for the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO(2)) in the surface waters of two stratified Mediterranean reservoirs were examined through the temporal decomposition of 5month time series with hourly sampling frequency. pCO(2) time series included similar patterns of variability at daily, biweekly, and seasonal scales regardless of the difference in amplitude of the pCO(2) variation in the two reservoirs studied. Daily variability was strongly related to the day-night cycles of metabolic activity, accounting for about one third of the total amplitude in pCO(2) variation. At a biweekly scale, wind forcing led to higher rates of air-water CO2 exchange and subsequently temporary partial mixing events associated to relevant increase of CO2 concentration in surface waters. Seasonal variability accounted for one third of the amplitude of the pCO(2) variability and was coupled to the seasonal dynamics of water temperature and thermal stratification of the water column. Our results provide evidence that CO2 emission from stratified water bodies shows significant variability at daily, biweekly, and seasonal scales; all of which should be taken into consideration in the analyses of the carbon fluxes. The wind-induced mixing events, operating at temporal scales between daily and seasonal cycles, may become a major factor controlling the pCO(2) dynamics. Hence, some of the most common models for computing CO2 fluxes from pCO(2) were not able to reproduce the biweekly response patterns of CO2 emissions to wind forcing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据