4.5 Article

Assessment of the total, stomatal, cuticular, and soil 2 year ozone budgets of an agricultural field with winter wheat and maize crops

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 1120-1132

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgrg.20094

关键词

ozone; resistance; deposition; wheat; maize

资金

  1. European Commission
  2. R2DS (Region Ile-de-France)
  3. French-German project PHOTONA (CNRS/INSU/DFG)
  4. French national project Vulnoz (ANR, VMC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates ozone (O-3) deposition to an agricultural field over a period of 2years. A two-layer soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer (Surfatm-O-3) model is used to partition the O-3 flux between the soil, the cuticular, and the stomatal pathways. The comparison between measured and modeled O-3 fluxes exhibited a good agreement, independently of the canopy structure and coverage and the climatic conditions, which implicitly validates the O-3 flux partitioning. The total, soil, cuticular, and stomatal O-3 budgets are then established from the modeling. Total ecosystem O-3 deposition over the 2year period was 87.5kgha(-1). Clearly, nonstomatal deposition dominates the deposition budget, especially the soil component which represented up to 50% of the total deposition. Nevertheless, the physiological and phenological differences of maize and winter wheat induced large difference in the stomatal deposition budgets of these two crops. Then, the effect of simplified parameterizations for soil and cuticular resistances currently used in other models on the O-3 budget is tested. Independently, these simplified parameterizations cause an underestimation of the O-3 deposition ranging between 0% and 11.2%. However, the combination of all simplifications resulted in an underestimation of the total O-3 deposition by about 20%. Finally, crop yield loss was estimated to be 1.5-4.2% for the winter wheat, whereas maize was not affected by O-3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据