4.5 Review

Sediment supply and channel morphology in mountain river systems: 1. Relative importance of lithology, topography, and climate

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 2325-2342

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JF002843

关键词

sediment supply; lithology; topography; channel morphology; stream bed armoring; braided streams

资金

  1. Geological Society of America Research Grant
  2. CU-Boulder Graduate School
  3. Gary Gaile Memorial Fellowship from the CU-Boulder Department of Geography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantifying landscape-scale variations in sediment supply to streams and rivers is fundamental to our understanding of both denudational processes and stream channel morpho-dynamics. Previous studies have linked a variety of sediment-supply proxies to climatic, topographic, or geologic factors, but few have connected these directly to the characteristics of fluvial systems draining these landscapes. Here we correlate landscape controls on sediment supply to observed sedimentology and channel patterns through direct measurements of water and sediment fluxes in over 80 drainage basins ranging in area from 1.4 to 35,000km(2) in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA. These data show that the relative sediment supply, defined by the bankfull sediment concentration, is dominated by basin lithology, while exhibiting little correlation to factors such as relief, mean basin slope, and drainage density. Bankfull sediment concentrations (bed load and suspended load) increase as much as 100-fold as basin lithology becomes dominated by softer sedimentary and volcanic rocks, relative to basins with more resistant lithologies. As bed load concentrations increase, stream beds become less armored, and bed load grain size coarsens. At very high sediment concentrations, bed surface, subsurface, and bed load grain sizes converge and a transition from single-thread to to braided channel patterns is commonly observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据