4.6 Article

Characteristics of Optically Thin Coastal Florida Cumuli Derived From Surface-Based Lidar Measurements

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 123, 期 18, 页码 10591-10605

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2018JD028867

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0923217]
  2. DOE ASR grant [DE-SC0013720]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0013720] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0923217] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The optical depths and sizes of optically thin passive shallow cumuli are characterized with a micropulse lidar. The measurements are from a coastal south Florida location spanning a 10-week synoptically suppressed winter time period with almost no upper-level clouds present. Clouds are distinguished from aerosol through visual comparison to zenith-viewing time-lapse camera images, establishing an instrument-specific particle backscatter coefficient threshold. Sun photometers provide a continuous independent aerosol optical depth estimate applied within the lidar retrieval of cloud optical depth. The focus is on clouds that do not attenuate the lidar signal. Clouds with optical depths less than one constitute more than 13% of the sampled data set, with decreasing optical depths occurring more frequently. Most of the clouds are less than 60m thick and are located below 1km. The optically thin regions occur most frequently in individual 15-s samples, corresponding to a horizontal width of less than 100m, with occasional stratiform segments extending up to 2km. Many segments border optically thicker regions, but some are self-contained, reflecting small-scale humidity variations near-saturation. To our knowledge, this study is the first to apply micropulse lidar data toward characterizing these low, shallow, broken clouds, too small for robust characterization from space but whose ubiquitiousness renders them radiatively important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据