4.6 Article

The low-level jet dust emission mechanism in the central Sahara: Observations from Bordj-Badji Mokhtar during the June 2011 Fennec Intensive Observation Period

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 119, 期 6, 页码 2990-3015

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020594

关键词

-

资金

  1. NERC consortium grant [NE/G017166/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G017166/1, 1077121, NE/G016283/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/G016283/1, NE/G017166/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the first detailed analysis of low-level jets (LLJs) in the central Sahara from ground-based observations at Bordj-Badji Mokhtar, Algeria, and addresses their operation as a dust emission mechanism. On LLJ mornings, composite wind speeds in the core (300 m aboveground level) reach 13.5 m s(-1) at 0400. Surface temperatures increase from 0545 (30 min after sunrise), and jet decay begins around 0600. Ten meter winds lag those in the core by 5 h; peak 10 m wind speed, 7.5 m s(-1), occurs at 0900. Only the deepest and strongest LLJs lead to dust emission. At 0600, these five LLJs have core wind speeds >= 16 m s(-1), below-core wind shear >= 0.6 m s(-1)/30m, and wind shear between the core and 500 m above the core <=-1.8 m s(-1). On these occasions, momentum mixes down from the LLJ after surface heating, leading to emission. On nondusty LLJ mornings, the convective boundary layer is 100 m shallower, and the LLJ is too weak to provide enough momentum to be mixed down for emission. LLJs are most frequently embedded in the monsoon flow or in the Harmattan; there is a clear association with the Saharan Heat Low. ERA-Interim reanalysis underestimates both Harmattan and monsoon LLJ core winds (by 4m s(-1) and 6 m s(-1), respectively). The Met Office Africa Limited Area Model underestimates Harmattan LLJ core winds by only 0.2 m s(-1). Monsoon LLJ core winds, however, are underestimated by 8.5 m s(-1). Surface winds at 0900 are underestimated in both cases by up to 6 m s(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据