4.6 Article

Liquid-top mixed-phase cloud detection from shortwave-infrared satellite radiometer observations: A physical basis

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2013JD021262

关键词

-

资金

  1. Naval Research Laboratory [N00173-10-C-2003, N00173-14-1-G902]
  2. Oceanographer of the Navy through the Program Executive Office [C4I/PMW-120, PE-0603207 N]
  3. DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University [W911NF-06-2-0015]
  4. Army Research Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meteorological clouds often exist in the liquid phase at temperatures below 0 degrees C. Traditionally, satellite-derived information on cloud phase comes from narrow bands in the shortwave and thermal infrared, with sensitivity biased strongly toward cloud top. In situ observations suggest an abundance of clouds having supercooled liquid water at their tops but a predominantly ice phase residing below. Satellites may report these clouds simply as supercooled liquid, with no further information regarding the presence of a subcloud top ice phase. Here we describe a physical basis for the detection of liquid-top mixed-phase clouds from passive satellite radiometer observations. The algorithm makes use of reflected sunlight in narrow bands at 1.6 and 2.25 mu m to optically probe below liquid-topped clouds and determine phase. Detection is predicated on differential absorption properties between liquid and ice particles, accounting for varying Sun/sensor geometry and cloud optical properties. When tested on numerical weather prediction model simulated cloud fields, the algorithm provided threat scores in the 0.6-0.8 range and false alarm rates in the 0.1-0.2 range. A case study based on surface and satellite observations of liquid-top mixed-phase clouds in northern Alaska was also examined. Preliminary results indicate promising potential for distinction between supercooled liquid-top phase clouds with and without an underlying mixed-phase component.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据