4.6 Review

Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 118, 期 11, 页码 5380-5552

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50171

关键词

black carbon; climate forcing; aerosol

资金

  1. International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) project
  2. Climate Program Office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  3. Radiation Sciences Program of the National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA)
  4. CSC
  5. Tully Graphics
  6. IGAC via the Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO) under NOAA [NA10OAR4320148, 2035]
  7. U.S. EPA [RD-83503401]
  8. NASA [RD-83503401]
  9. NSF [ATM 08-52775]
  10. DOE [DE-SC0006689, DE-AC06-76RLO 1830]
  11. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit award
  12. Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  13. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program
  14. DOE Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction using Earth System Models (EaSM) program
  15. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT)
  16. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  17. global environment research fund of the Japanese Ministry of the Environment [A-1101]
  18. EUCAARI project (EU-FP6) [34684]
  19. U.S. National Science Foundation
  20. European Union Seventh Research Framework Programme (MACC project) [218793]
  21. U.S. NSF [ARC-06-12636]
  22. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB403405]
  23. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23221001] Funding Source: KAKEN
  24. Directorate For Geosciences
  25. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1208862] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  26. Directorate For Geosciences
  27. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1118460, 0852775] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  28. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G021694/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  29. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I014721/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  30. EPSRC [EP/I014721/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  31. ESRC [ES/G021694/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  32. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006689] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Black carbon aerosol plays a unique and important role in Earth's climate system. Black carbon is a type of carbonaceous material with a unique combination of physical properties. This assessment provides an evaluation of black-carbon climate forcing that is comprehensive in its inclusion of all known and relevant processes and that is quantitative in providing best estimates and uncertainties of the main forcing terms: direct solar absorption; influence on liquid, mixed phase, and ice clouds; and deposition on snow and ice. These effects are calculated with climate models, but when possible, they are evaluated with both microphysical measurements and field observations. Predominant sources are combustion related, namely, fossil fuels for transportation, solid fuels for industrial and residential uses, and open burning of biomass. Total global emissions of black carbon using bottom-up inventory methods are 7500 Gg yr(-1) in the year 2000 with an uncertainty range of 2000 to 29000. However, global atmospheric absorption attributable to black carbon is too low in many models and should be increased by a factor of almost 3. After this scaling, the best estimate for the industrial-era (1750 to 2005) direct radiative forcing of atmospheric black carbon is +0.71 W m(-2) with 90% uncertainty bounds of (+0.08, +1.27) W m(-2). Total direct forcing by all black carbon sources, without subtracting the preindustrial background, is estimated as +0.88 (+0.17, +1.48) W m(-2). Direct radiative forcing alone does not capture important rapid adjustment mechanisms. A framework is described and used for quantifying climate forcings, including rapid adjustments. The best estimate of industrial-era climate forcing of black carbon through all forcing mechanisms, including clouds and cryosphere forcing, is +1.1 W m(-2) with 90% uncertainty bounds of +0.17 to +2.1 W m(-2). Thus, there is a very high probability that black carbon emissions, independent of co-emitted species, have a positive forcing and warm the climate. We estimate that black carbon, with a total climate forcing of +1.1 W m(-2), is the second most important human emission in terms of its climate forcing in the present-day atmosphere; only carbon dioxide is estimated to have a greater forcing. Sources that emit black carbon also emit other short-lived species that may either cool or warm climate. Climate forcings from co-emitted species are estimated and used in the framework described herein. When the principal effects of short-lived co-emissions, including cooling agents such as sulfur dioxide, are included in net forcing, energy-related sources (fossil fuel and biofuel) have an industrial-era climate forcing of +0.22 (-0.50 to +1.08) W m(-2) during the first year after emission. For a few of these sources, such as diesel engines and possibly residential biofuels, warming is strong enough that eliminating all short-lived emissions from these sources would reduce net climate forcing (i.e., produce cooling). When open burning emissions, which emit high levels of organic matter, are included in the total, the best estimate of net industrial-era climate forcing by all short-lived species from black-carbon-rich sources becomes slightly negative (-0.06 W m(-2) with 90% uncertainty bounds of -1.45 to +1.29 W m(-2)). The uncertainties in net climate forcing from black-carbon-rich sources are substantial, largely due to lack of knowledge about cloud interactions with both black carbon and co-emitted organic carbon. In prioritizing potential black-carbon mitigation actions, non-science factors, such as technical feasibility, costs, policy design, and implementation feasibility play important roles. The major sources of black carbon are presently in different stages with regard to the feasibility for near-term mitigation. This assessment, by evaluating the large number and complexity of the associated physical and radiative processes in black-carbon climate forcing, sets a baseline from which to improve future climate forcing estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据