4.6 Article

Characterization of speciated aerosol direct radiative forcing over California

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 118, 期 5, 页码 2372-2388

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012JD018364

关键词

-

资金

  1. California Air Resources Board (CARB) [08-323]
  2. DOE Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. PNNL Institutional Computing
  5. Battelle Memorial Institute [DE-AC06-76RLO330 1830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The WRF-Chem model, with the added capability of diagnosing the direct radiative forcing of individual aerosol species, is used to characterize the spatial and seasonal distribution of speciated aerosol direct radiative forcing over California. Overall, the simulation in 2005 is able to reproduce the observed spatial and seasonal distribution of total PM2.5 mass concentration and the relative contribution from individual aerosol species. On statewide average over California, all aerosol species reduce the surface net radiation fluxes, with a total by about 1.5Wm(-2) (winter minimum) to 3Wm(-2) (summer maximum). Elemental carbon (EC) is the largest contributor in summer (-1.1Wm(-2) and similar to 35%), and sulfate is the largest in winter (-0.45Wm(-2) and similar to 30%). In the atmosphere, total aerosol introduces a warming effect of about 0.5Wm(-2) (winter minimum) to 2Wm(-2) (summer maximum). EC and dust contribute about 75 - 95% and 1 - 10% of the total warming through the seasons, respectively. At the top of the atmosphere (TOA), the overall total aerosol direct radiative effect is cooling of -1.0Wm(-2) through the seasons, with sulfate as the biggest contributor of -0.4Wm(-2) (winter minimum) to -0.7Wm(-2) (summer maximum). EC produces a TOA warming of up to about 0.7Wm(-2), whereas all other aerosol species produce a TOA cooling. The diagnostic method implemented in WRF-Chem can be applied to other regions to understand the roles of different aerosols in the direct radiative forcing and regional climate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据