4.5 Article

Three-dimensional Martian ionosphere model: I. The photochemical ionosphere below 180 km

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS
卷 118, 期 10, 页码 2105-2123

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/jgre.20150

关键词

Mars; ionosphere; model; photochemistry

资金

  1. CSIC
  2. European Social Fund
  3. Spanish MICINN [CSD2009-00038, AYA2011-23552/ESP]
  4. HELIOSARES Project
  5. ANR [ANR-09-BLAN-0223]
  6. ESA-CNES project Mars Climate Database and Physical Models
  7. NASA UARS mission
  8. TIMED mission
  9. SOHO mission
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-BLAN-0223] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the Mars ionosphere with unprecedented detail in 3-D, as simulated by a Mars general circulation model (the Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique Mars GCM), and compare it with recent measurements. The model includes a number of recent extensions and improvements. Different simulations for a full Martian year have been performed. The electron density at the main ionospheric peak is shown to vary with the Sun-Mars distance and with the solar variability, both in the long-term (11 year solar cycle) and on shorter temporal scales (solar rotation). The main electronic peak is shown to be located at the same pressure level during all the Martian year. As a consequence, its altitude varies with latitude, local time, and season according to the natural expansions and fluctuations of the neutral atmosphere, in agreement with previous models. The model predicts a nighttime ionosphere due only to photochemistry. The simulated ionosphere close to the evening terminator is in agreement with observations. No effort has been made to explain the patchy ionosphere observed in the deep nightside. We have compared the modeled ionosphere with Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding data. The model reproduces the solar zenith angle variability of the electron density and the altitude of the peak, although it underestimates the electron density at the main peak by about 20%. The electron density at the secondary peak is strongly underestimated by the model, probably due to a very crude representation of the X-ray solar flux. This is one of the aspects that needs a revision in future versions of the model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据