4.7 Article

Lithographic patterning of ferromagnetic FePt nanoparticles from a single-source bimetallic precursor containing hemiphasmidic structure for magnetic data recording media

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 566-576

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-018-9350-4

关键词

FePt nanoparticles; single-source bimetallic precursors; one-pot pyrolysis; lithographic patterning; magnetic data recording media

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21701112, 21504074, 51573151]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [HKBU12317216, PolyU153062/18P, PolyU153015/14P]
  3. Areas of Excellence Scheme, University Grants Committee of HKSAR [AoE/P-03/08]
  4. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [1-ZE1C, 1-ZE25]
  5. Science, Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20160531193836532]
  6. Ms Clarea Au for the Endowed Professorship in Energy [847S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patterning of L1(0) FePt nanoparticles (NPs) with high coercivity offers a promising route to develop bit-patterned media (BPM) for the next generation magnetic data recording system, but the synthesis of monodisperse FePt NPs and mass production of their nanopatterns has been a long-standing challenge. Here, highly efficient nanoimprint lithography was applied for large-scale universal patterning, which was achieved by imprinting the solution of a single-source bimetallic precursor. The rigid coplanar metallic cores and the surrounding flexible tails in the bimetallic complex permit the spontaneous molecular arrangements to form the highly ordered negative morphology replicated from the soft template. In-situ pyrolysis study was then investigated by one-pot pyrolysis of the precursor under an Ar/H-2 atmosphere, and the resultant NPs were fully characterized to identify the phase, morphology and magnetic properties. Finally, highly-ordered patterns on certain substrates were preserved perfectly after pyrolysis and could be potentially utilized in magnetic data recording media.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据