4.7 Review

Mesoporous carbon biomaterials

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 241-257

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-015-0037-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302293, 51132009]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [13ZR1463500]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [14QA1404100]
  4. Youth Scholar of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructures [SKL201203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nano-biotechnology provides highly efficient and versatile strategies to improve the diagnostic precision and therapeutic efficiency of serious diseases. The development of new biomaterial systems provides great opportunities for the successful clinical translation of nano-biotechnology for personalized biomedicine to benefit patients. As a new inorganic material system, mesoporous carbon biomaterials (MCBs) combine the merits of a mesoporous nanostructure and carbonaceous composition, showing superior qualities compared with traditional mesoporous silica and other carbon-based nanosystems, such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, and fullerene. Thus, this review focuses on the rational design, chemical synthesis, and biomedical applications of MCBs. The synthetic strategies for MCBs, especially mesoporous carbon nanoparticles (MCNs), are summarized, and several representative biomedical applications of MCBs are discussed in detail. MCBs perform well for on-demand drug-release, photothermal therapy, synergistic therapy, fluorescent labeling of cancer cells, bio-adsorption of in vivo toxic pathogenic substances, peptide separation, and biosensing. The preliminary biosafety issue of MCBs is also briefly discussed. Finally, the critical issues and challenges facing the future development of MCBs for clinical translation are considered. There is great promise for MCBs to reach clinical translations for biomedical applications based on their unique nanostructure, composition, and biocompatibility once some critical issues are fully addressed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据