4.7 Article

How does negative Poisson's ratio of foam filler affect crashworthiness?

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 247-259

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.050

关键词

Negative Poisson's ratio (NPR); Foam-filled tubes; Multiobjective optimization; Crashworthiness; Auxetic foam

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11232004, 11372106]
  2. New Century Excellent Talents Program in University of China [NCET-12-0168]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Creative Research Groups of China [12JJ7001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an effective candidate for enhancing energy absorption, a range of foam materials have gained considerable popularity, in which the density, Young's modulus and plasticity of foam materials are considered critical to crashworthiness. Relatively speaking, less attention has been paid to the roles played by the Poisson's ratio of foam or cellular materials. More importantly, the interaction between different Poisson's ratios and thin-walled structures has been a critical yet under-studied issue. This paper aims to explore the effects of negative, zero and positive Poisson's ratio of auxetic foams, ranging from -1 to 0.5, on structural crashworthiness and seek optimal design for different foam-filled square, circular and conic tubes. In this study the specific energy absorption (SEA) and mean crushing force (MCF) are taken as the objective functions by using mathematical regression analysis. The sequential quadratic programming (SQP) and the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) are employed for single and multiobjective design of foam-filled tubes with different Poisson's ratios, respectively. The optimal Poisson's ratio is obtained for these three different types of foam-filled tubes. By comparison we found that the crashworthiness of foam filled conic tube is the best, followed by circular and then squared tubes. The study provides new insights into material selection and design with a more favorable Poisson's ratio for crashworthiness. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据