期刊
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 403-408出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wsb.67
关键词
cable restraint; Canis latrans; capture efficiency; capture selectivity; coyote; Michigan; snare.
资金
- Federal Aid in Restoration Act under Pitman-Robertson Project [W-147-R]
- Michigan Department of Natural Resources
- Mississippi State University
We compared efficiency and selectivity of 2 cable restraints with a 10.8-cm-(larger) or 8.9-cm(smaller) diameter minimum loop stop to live-capture coyotes (Canis latrans) in Michigan, USA. Cable restraints were set for 3,166 (larger) and 1,175 (smaller) trap-nights, respectively, during March 2008 and January-March 2009. Capture efficiency was 64% (n = 22 coyotes) and 100% (n = 11 coyotes) for cable restraints with larger and smaller diameter minimum loop stops, respectively. Coyotes captured in cable restraints with larger or smaller minimum loop stops were similar in size. Selectivity of cable restraints with larger and smaller minimum loop stops was 100% and 79%, respectively; nontarget species captured included white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and northern raccoon (Procyon lotor). Based on our findings, we recommend the smaller minimum loop stop diameter for capture of coyotes. We also recommend further testing of cable restraints and set placement for coyotes to improve capture efficacy. (C) 2011 The Wildlife Society.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据