4.2 Article

Weight loss-there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices?

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 523-529

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-011-0076-5

关键词

mHealth; Weight loss; Smartphones; Apps

资金

  1. [K07CA124905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about how much smartphone apps for weight control adhere to evidence-informed practices. The aim of this study was to review and summarize the content of available weight control apps. Information on content, user rating, and price was extracted from iTunes on September 25, 2009. Apps (n = 204) were coded for adherence to 13 evidence-informed practices for weight control. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of apps based on endorsement practices. Only a small percentage of apps had five or more of the 13 practices (15%). Latent class analysis revealed three main types of apps: diet, physical activity, and weight journals (19%); dietary advice and journals (34%); and weight trackers (46%). User ratings were not associated with apps from these three classes. Many apps have insufficient evidence-informed content. Research is needed that seeks to develop, improve, and evaluate these apps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据