4.7 Article

A two-swarm cooperative particle swarms optimization

期刊

SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 1-18

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2013.10.003

关键词

Particle swarm optimization; Evolutionary algorithm; Large search interval; Optimization methods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a powerful stochastic evolutionary algorithm based on swarm intelligence. However, the canonical PSO is easily and prematurely trapped in the local optima due to loss of its diversity. Although some improved algorithms retain the diversity, their speeds of convergence become slow. Meanwhile, PSO could only find out the global optimum in a small search interval, which greatly limits its applications to many practical engineering problems. In this study, the two-swarm cooperative particle swarm optimization (TCPSO) is presented. TCPSO can not only catch the global optimum in a large search space such as 2 x 10(10), but also obtains a good balance between the swarm diversity and the convergence speed. It uses two particle swarms, the slave swarm and the master swarm with the clear division of their works. The former particles are updated without using the current velocities, the dimension of each particle learns from the same dimension of its neighboring particle instead of the best-so-far position. These features make the particles of the slave swarm concentrate toward the local optimum, thus accelerating the convergence. The latter particles are updated based on the former particles. And the equation in which the velocities of its particles are updated uses a large inertia weight. The feature of the master swarm keeps its diversity invariant. The experiments on TCPSO through 14 test functions showed that it significantly improves the performance of PSO and possesses the best performance among all the examined problems no matter multimodal or unimodal functions. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据