4.6 Article

The role of HOXB2 and HOXB3 in acute myeloid leukemia

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.071

关键词

Acute myeloid leukemia; HOXB2; HOXB3; FLT3; STAT5; Colony formation

资金

  1. Kungliga Fysiografiska Sallskapet i Lund [20141112]
  2. Ollie and Elof Ericssons Stiftelse [20140908]
  3. Ake-Wiberg Stiftelse [134061257]
  4. Lars Hiertas Minne Stiftelse [FO2014-0302]
  5. Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmastare [20130128]
  6. Harald Jeanssons Stiftelse
  7. Harald och Greta Jeanssons Stiftelse [20141114]
  8. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation [PR2014-0059]
  9. Crafoord foundation [20150760]
  10. Stiftelsen Clas Groschinskys Minnesfond [M15 96]
  11. Gunnar Nilssons Cancer Foundation [CAN 201404]
  12. Swedish Cancer Society [CAN 2012/781]
  13. Swedish Research Council [CAN 2013-3728]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous aggressive disease and the most common form of adult leukemia. Mutations in the type III receptor tyrosine kinase FLT3 are found in more than 30% of AML patients. Drugs against FLT3 have been developed for the treatment of AML, but they lack specificity, show poor response and lead to the development of a resistant phenotype upon treatment. Therefore, a deeper understanding of FLT3 signaling will facilitate identification of additional pharmacological targets in FLT3-driven AML. In this report, we identify HOXB2 and HOXB3 as novel regulators of oncogenic FLT3-ITD-driven AML We show that HOXB2 and HOXB3 expression is upregulated in a group of AML patients carrying FLT3-ITD. Overexpression of HOXB2 or HOXB3 in mouse pro-B cells resulted in decreased FLT3-ITD-dependent cell proliferation as well as colony formation and increased apoptosis. Expression of HOXB2 or HOXB3 resulted in a significant decrease in FLT3-ITD-induced AKT, ERR, p38 and STAT5 phosphorylation. Our data suggest that HOXB2 and HOXB3 act as tumor suppressors in FLT3-ITD driven AML. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据