4.5 Review

Comprehensive computer searches and reporting in systematic reviews

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

A method for evaluating research syntheses: The quality, conclusions, and consensus of 12 syntheses of the effects of after-school programs

Jeffrey C. Valentine et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2010)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study

Andrea C. Tricco et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy

Anne M. Moseley et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies

Margaret Sampson et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Beverley J. Shea et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)

Review Information Science & Library Science

A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies

Maria J. Grant et al.

HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL (2009)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

An Empirical Assessment of Meta-Analytic Practice

Nathan F. Dieckmann et al.

REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)

Article Information Science & Library Science

Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews

Adriana Yoshii et al.

JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION (2009)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

PsycINFO search strategies identified methodologically sound therapy studies and review articles for use by clinicians and researchers

Angela May Eady et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews

Margaret Sampson et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology Why Do We Need Them? What Might They Be?

Harris Cooper et al.

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2008)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews

David Moher et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2007)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

EMBASE search strategies achieved for retrieving methodologically high sensitivity and specificity sound systematic reviews

Nancy L. Wilczynski et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?

D Ogilvie et al.

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2005)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed

KA Robinson et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2002)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting

DF Stroup et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2000)