4.6 Article

Potential Control of Listeria monocytogenes by Bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus hirae ST57ACC and Pediococcus pentosaceus ST65ACC Strains Isolated From Artisanal Cheese

期刊

PROBIOTICS AND ANTIMICROBIAL PROTEINS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 696-704

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12602-018-9449-0

关键词

Antibiotic resistance; Beneficial strains; Bacteriocins; LAB; Listeria monocytogenes

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao deAmparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus hirae ST57ACC and Pediococcus pentosaceus ST65ACC strains, previously isolated from artisanal cheese, were evaluated for their safety with the aim to determine whether they could be used as beneficial strains, especially in the control of Listeria monocytogenes. Both isolates survived simulated gastrointestinal conditions and showed high levels of auto- and co-aggregation with L. monocytogenes, although the hydrophobicity of cells varied. Using the agar-spot test with 33 commercial drugs from different groups, only anti-inflammatory drugs and drugs containing loratadine and propranolol hydrochloride were able to affect the growth of the tested strains. Both strains were resistant to 3 out of 11 antibiotics tested by the disc diffusion method, and low frequencies of antibiotic resistance-encoding genes were observed by PCR analysis. Tested strains neither presented biogenic amine-related genes nor produced these substances. Aside from some antibiotic resistance characteristics, the tested strains were considered safe as they lack other virulence-related genes. E. hirae ST57ACC and P. pentosaceus ST65ACC both presented beneficial properties, particularly their ability to survive gastrointestinal conditions and to aggregate with L. monocytogenes, which can facilitate the elimination of this pathogen. Further studies should be conducted to better understand these interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据