4.2 Article

Factors influencing people's ability to maintain their activity levels during treatment for soft tissue sarcoma - A qualitative study

期刊

PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 923-932

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1519622

关键词

Soft tissue sarcoma; physical activity; chemotherapy

资金

  1. Sarcoma Unit
  2. Royal Marsden Therapies Department
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research Biomedical Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare connective tissue cancer treated with chemotherapy in the advanced stages. Emerging evidence suggests that physical activity (PA) improves symptom management and quality of life for people undergoing chemotherapy for advanced cancer. However, little research reports their perspective.Method:Semi-structured interviews were used within a phenomenological approach to explore factors that affect people's ability to be physically active while undergoing treatment. Six participants were recruited with purposive sampling. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.Results:Three themes identified that PA was seen as an indicator of a persons' own sense of normality; a feeling of loss and uncertainty for the future had impacts on peoples' ability to be physically active, and finally, participants found it challenging to recognize their support needs as their activity levels reduced. Motivation to remain active was individual, and numerous barriers affected participants' ability to remain active as their disease advanced; this included a lack of specific guidance while undergoing chemotherapy. Participants expressed uncertainty generally in identifying and expressing their support needs as they faced multiple complex issues.Conclusion:Health professionals should be proactive in exploring possibilities for PA to mitigate the expected physical decline, and support symptom management while undergoing palliative chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据