4.6 Review

Trial watch Cardiac glycosides and cancer therapy

期刊

ONCOIMMUNOLOGY
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/onci.23082

关键词

breast carcinoma; Digitalis purpurea; estrogen receptor; immunogenic cell death; ouabain; phytoestrogens

资金

  1. European Commission (ArtForce)
  2. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR)
  3. Ligue contre le Cancer (Equipe labellisee)
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  5. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  6. LabEx Immuno-Oncologie
  7. Fondation de France
  8. Fondation Bettencourt-Schueller
  9. AXA Chair for Longevity Research
  10. Canceropole Ile-de-France
  11. Paris Alliance of Cancer Research Institutes (PACRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiac glycosides (CGs) are natural compounds sharing the ability to operate as potent inhibitors of the plasma membrane Na+/K+-ATPase, hence promoting-via an indirect mechanism-the intracellular accumulation of Ca2+ ions. In cardiomyocytes, increased intracellular Ca2+ concentrations exert prominent positive inotropic effects, that is, they increase myocardial contractility. Owing to this feature, two CGs, namely digoxin and digitoxin, have extensively been used in the past for the treatment of several cardiac conditions, including distinct types of arrhythmia as well as contractility disorders. Nowadays, digoxin is approved by the FDA and indicated for the treatment of congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response, whereas the use of digitoxin has been discontinued in several Western countries. Recently, CGs have been suggested to exert potent antineoplastic effects, notably as they appear to increase the immunogenicity of dying cancer cells. In this Trial Watch, we summarize the mechanisms that underpin the unsuspected anticancer potential of CGs and discuss the progress of clinical studies that have evaluated/are evaluating the safety and efficacy of CGs for oncological indications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据