4.3 Article

Replication Timing Aberrations and Aneuploidy in Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes of Breast Cancer Patients

期刊

NEOPLASIA
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 668-674

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/neo.10568

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with hematological malignancies or solid tumors, such as renal cell carcinoma or prostate cancer, display epigenetic aberrations (loss of synchronous replication of allelic counterparts) and genetic changes (aneuploidy) characteristic of the cancerous phenotype. This study sought to determine whether such alterations could differentiate breast cancer patients from cancer-free subjects. METHODS: The HER2 locus-an oncogene assigned to chromosome 17 whose amplification is associated with breast cancer (BCA)-and the pericentromeric satellite sequence of chromosome 17 (CEN17) were used for replication timing assessments. Aneuploidy was monitored by enumerating the copy numbers of chromosome 17. Replication timing and aneuploidy were detected cytogenetically using fluorescence in situ hybridization technology applied to phytohemagglutinin- stimulated lymphocytes of 20 women with BCA and 10 control subjects. RESULTS: We showed that both the HER2 and CEN17 loci in the stimulated BCA lymphocytes altered their characteristic pattern of synchronous replication and exhibited asynchronicity. In addition, there was an increase in chromosome 17 aneuploidy. The frequency of cells displaying asynchronous replication in the patients' samples was significantly higher (P < 10(-12) for HER2 and P < 10(-6) for CEN17) than the corresponding values in the control samples. Similarly, aneuploidy in patients' cells was significantly higher (P < 10(-9)) than that in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: The HER2 and CEN17 aberrant replication differentiated clearly between BCA patients and control subjects. Thus, monitoring the replication of these genes offers potential blood markers for the detection and monitoring of breast cancer. Neoplasia (2010) 12, 668-674

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据