4.3 Article

Overexpression of Elafin in Ovarian Carcinoma Is Driven by Genomic Gains and Activation of the Nuclear Factor κB Pathway and Is Associated with Poor Overall Survival

期刊

NEOPLASIA
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 161-U88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/neo.91542

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [P50-CA105009, K08 CA108748, K12 CA87723]
  2. Robert and Deborah First Fund
  3. Randi and Joel Cutler Ovarian Cancer Research Fund
  4. Fannie E. Ripple Foundation
  5. Phi Beta Psi Sorority Charitable Trust
  6. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund
  7. Madeline Franchi Ovarian Cancer Foundation
  8. Harvard Medical School Center of Excellence in Women's Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in women. The aim of this study was to elucidate whether whey acidic protein (WAP) genes on chromosome 20q13.12, a region frequently amplified in this cancer, are expressed in serous carcinoma, the most common form of the disease. Herein, we report that a trio of WAP genes (HE4, SLPI, and Elafin) is overexpressed and secreted by serous ovarian carcinomas. To our knowledge, this is the first report linking Elafin to ovarian cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of primary tumors demonstrates genomic gains of the Elafin locus in a majority of cases. In addition, a combination of peptidomimetics, RNA interference, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments shows that Elafin expression can be transcriptionally upregulated by inflammatory cytokines through activation of the nuclear factor kappa B pathway. Importantly, using a clinically annotated tissue microarray composed of late-stage, high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, we show that Elafin expression correlates with poor overall survival. These results, combined with our observation that Elafin is secreted by ovarian tumors and is minimally expressed in normal tissues, suggest that Elafin may serve as a determinant of poor survival in this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据