4.8 Article

Rationalizing phonon dispersion for lattice thermal conductivity of solids

期刊

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 888-894

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwy097

关键词

thermoelectric; thermal conductivity; minimal thermal conductivity; phonon dispersion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB0703600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11474219, 51772215]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Science and Technology Innovation Plan of Shanghai [18JC1414600]
  4. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [20170072210001]
  5. 'Shu Guang' project - Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  6. Shanghai Education Development Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lattice thermal conductivity (kappa(L)) is one of the most fundamental properties of solids. The acoustic-elastic-wave assumption, proposed by Debye (Debye P. Ann Phys 1912; 344: 789-839), has led to linear phonon dispersion being the most common approximation for understanding phonon transport over the past century. Such an assumption does not take into account the effect of a periodic boundary condition on the phonon dispersion, originating from the nature of periodicity on atomic arrangements. Driven by modern demands on the thermal functionality of materials, with kappa(L) ranging from ultra-low to ultra-high, any deviation from the Debye approximation in real materials becomes more and more significant. This work takes into account the periodic boundary condition, and therefore rationalizes the phonon dispersion to be more realistic. This significantly improves the precision for quickly predicting kappa(L) without any fitting parameters, as demonstrated in hundreds of materials, and offers a theoretical basis rationalizing kappa(L) to be lower than the minimum currently accepted based on the Debye dispersion. This work paves the way for designing solids with expected kappa(L) and particularly inspires the advancement of low-kappa(L) materials for thermal energy applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据