4.8 Article

Genomes from uncultivated prokaryotes: a comparison of metagenome-assembled and single-amplified genomes

期刊

MICROBIOME
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0550-0

关键词

Single-amplified genomes; Metagenome-assembled genomes; Metagenomics; Binning; Single-cell genomics

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council VR [2011-4369, 2015-04254, 2011-5689, 2015-04959]
  2. BONUS BLUEPRINT project - BONUS [185]
  3. EU
  4. Swedish Research Council FORMAS
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [310039-PUZZLE_CELL]
  6. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF-FFL5)
  7. Uppsala University SciLifeLab SFO funds
  8. Swedish Research Council [2015-04959, 2015-04254] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Prokaryotes dominate the biosphere and regulate biogeochemical processes essential to all life. Yet, our knowledge about their biology is for the most part limited to the minority that has been successfully cultured. Molecular techniques now allow for obtaining genome sequences of uncultivated prokaryotic taxa, facilitating in-depth analyses that may ultimately improve our understanding of these key organisms. Results: We compared results from two culture-independent strategies for recovering bacterial genomes: single-amplified genomes and metagenome-assembled genomes. Single-amplified genomes were obtained from samples collected at an offshore station in the Baltic Sea Proper and compared to previously obtained metagenome-assembled genomes from a time series at the same station. Among 16 single-amplified genomes analyzed, seven were found to match metagenome-assembled genomes, affiliated with a diverse set of taxa. Notably, genome pairs between the two approaches were nearly identical (average 99.51% sequence identity; range 98.77-99.84%) across overlapping regions (30-80% of each genome). Within matching pairs, the single-amplified genomes were consistently smaller and less complete, whereas the genetic functional profiles were maintained. For the metagenome-assembled genomes, only on average 3.6% of the bases were estimated to be missing from the genomes due to wrongly binned contigs. Conclusions: The strong agreement between the single-amplified and metagenome-assembled genomes emphasizes that both methods generate accurate genome information from uncultivated bacteria. Importantly, this implies that the research questions and the available resources are allowed to determine the selection of genomics approach for microbiome studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据