4.5 Article

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

期刊

JACC-HEART FAILURE
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 500-507

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.06.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medtronic
  2. Sorin
  3. St. Jude Medical
  4. Biotronik
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. ERB Systems
  7. Abbott
  8. Cordis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The purpose of this study is to determine whether, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) is associated with a better outcome than treatment with rate-slowing drugs. Background Different trials have demonstrated that CRT is effective in treating heart failure (HF) patients who are in sinus rhythm (SR). No trials have addressed whether CRT confers similar benefits on AF patients, with or without AVJA. Methods The clinical outcomes of CRT for patients with permanent AF undergoing CRT combined with either AVJA (n = 443) or rate-slowing drugs (n = 895) were compared with those of SR patients (n = 6,046). Results Median follow-up was 37 months. Total mortality (6.8 vs. 6.1 per 100 person-years) and cardiac mortality (4.2 vs. 4.0) were similar for patients with AF+AVJA and patients in SR (both p = NS). In contrast, the AF+drugs group had a higher total and cardiac mortality than the SR group and the AF+AVJA group (11.3 and 8.1, respectively; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, AF+AVJA had total mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 0.74 to 1.67) and cardiac mortality (HR: 0.88, 95% Cl: 0.66 to 1.17) similar to that of the SR group, independent of known confounders. The AF+drugs group, however, had a higher total mortality (HR: 1.52, 95% Cl: 1.26 to 1.82) and cardiac mortality (HR: 1.57, 95% Cl: 1.27 to 1.94) than both the SR group and the AF+AVJA group (both p <0.001). Conclusions Long-term survival after CRT among patients with AF+AVJA is similar to that observed among patients in SR. Mortality is higher for AF patients treated with rate-slowing drugs. (1 Am Coll Cardiol HF 2013;1:500-7) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据