4.5 Article

Growth Velocity Reduced with Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray in Prepubescent Children with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.04.008

关键词

Stadiometry; Children; Intranasal corticosteroid; 24-Hour urinary cortisol; Randomized clinical trial; Placebo controlled

资金

  1. Fundacion Cidea
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Merck
  4. Uriach
  5. Nycomed
  6. MedImmune
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The effect of fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) on growth in prepubescent children has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the difference in mean prepubescent growth velocities, as determined by stadiometry, between patients treated continuously for 1 year with FFNS 110 mcg once daily and placebo nasal spray. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group 76-week safety study. Nasal symptom assessments were used as a measure of adherence. Eligible patients were ages 5 to <8.5 years at screening and had at least a 1-year clinical history and diagnosis of perennial allergic rhinitis, including a positive skin test or specific IgE to an appropriate perennial allergen within the past year. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-six patients in the FFNS group and 187 patients in the placebo group completed the entire 52-week treatment period. During treatment, the least squares mean growth velocity was 5.19 cm/y for the FFNS group and 5.46 cm/y for the placebo group; mean difference, -0.270 cm/y (95% CI, -0.48 to -0.06 cm/y). Other safety assessments, including 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion, were comparable between the treatment groups. Daily reflective total nasal symptom scores declined similarly in both the FFNS and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Once-daily treatment with FFNS over 52 weeks in prepubescent children resulted in a small reduction in growth velocity compared with placebo. Clinicians will need to balance the reduction in growth observed with FFNS to its potential for clinical benefit. (C) 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据