4.1 Article

Proposal of a new equation to estimate globe temperature in an urban park environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 23-32

出版社

SOC AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY JAPAN
DOI: 10.2480/agrmet.69.1.4

关键词

Empirical equation; Globe temperature; Ground surface condition; Heat balance; WBGT; Wet bulb globe temperature

资金

  1. Research Program on Climate Change Adaptation (RECCA)
  2. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan [S-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Globe temperature is one element of the heat stress index, the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature, which is used to evaluate how radiation adds to thermal discomfort in the workplace. As the measurement of globe temperature is not standardized, empirical equations were introduced to estimate the globe temperature from weather factors, including air temperature, solar radiation and wind speed. As it was not known whether these equations were applicable in an urban park environment with vegetation, we observed the globe temperature using a set of instruments in three parks. The observation along with the heat balance analysis of the globe revealed that the globe temperature depended curvilinearly on solar radiation and that wind speed influenced this dependence. We compared two previously proposed empirical equations to the observed globe temperature and found both equations had systematic estimation errors. Although the errors were reduced by fitting the equations to the observed data and reevaluating their numerical constants, the equations still had shortcomings, as one did not consider wind speed and the other included a discontinuity. We therefore derived a new equation based on the heat balance equations of the globe with its numerical constants experimentally determined. This equation was able to predict the curvilinear dependence of the globe temperature on global solar radiation without any discontinuity, and it also showed the globe temperature response to wind speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据