4.6 Article

Dynamic Mobile Crowdsourcing Selection for Electricity Load Forecasting

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 46926-46937

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2866641

关键词

Mobile crowdsourcing; electricity load forecasting; dynamic selection; threshold; priority

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61872219, 61672276]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1400600]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization, Nanjing University, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018PF007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The continuous growth of mobile devices in recent years has created a variety of opportunities for people to utilize the crowdsourcing technique to execute various intelligent computing and processing tasks, e.g., electricity load forecasting. However, there are few research in the field of real-time and accurate forecasting of electricity load in a dynamic environment, and this leads to an unsatisfactory result when applying the forecasting method to the real environment. In view of this challenge, in this paper, we propose a dynamic mobile crowdsourcing selection method for electricity load forecasting considering the dynamic arrivals of both crowdsourcing tasks and candidate workers to help the crowdsourcing platform find the ideal workers for the crowdsourcing tasks. Concretely, in our method, a system model is firstly established to quantify the ability of candidate workers in executing the crowdsourcing task when both workers and tasks arrive at or leave the platform dynamically; afterwards, a dynamic worker selection method is proposed based on the ability threshold of workers and the task priority. Finally, through a set of simulated experiments, we validate the feasibility of our proposal in terms of effectiveness and efficiency when making accurate electricity load forecasting through mobile crowdsourcing technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据