4.6 Article

Deep Dilation on Multimodality Time Series for Human Activity Recognition

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 53381-53396

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870841

关键词

Dilation operation; deep learning; feature representation; human activity recognition; multimodality time series

资金

  1. NSF China Projects [61472067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Providing accurate information on people's activities and behaviors plays an important role in innumerable applications, such as medical, security, and entertainment. In recent years, deep learning has been applied in human activity recognition, and achieved a better performance. However, if the spatial dependency of inter-sensors is considered, it is possible to enhance the discriminative ability. In this paper, we present a novel deep learning framework for human activity recognition problems. First, on the basis of our previous work, we utilize dilated convolutional neural network to extract features of inter-sensors and intra-sensors. Since the extracted features are local and short-temporal, it is necessary to utilize RNN to model the long-temporal dependencies. However, duo to that LSTM and GRU often rely on the completely previous computations, it will result in slow inference and hard convergence. Hence, inspired by the idea of dilation operation, we present a novel recurrent model to learn the temporal dependencies at different time scales. Then, at the topmost layer, a fully-connected layer with softmax function is utilized to generate a class probability distribution, and the predicted activity is obtained. Eventually, we evaluate the proposed framework in two open human activity datasets, OPPORTUNITY and PAMAP2. Results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves a higher classification performance than the state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, it takes the least time to recognize an activity. Besides, it also performs faster and easier to converge in the training stage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据