4.6 Article

Long Short Term Memory Hyperparameter Optimization for a Neural Network Based Emotion Recognition Framework

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 49325-49338

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2868361

关键词

Differential evolution; emotion recognition; hyperparameter optimization; long short term memory; wearable physiological sensors

资金

  1. QUT International Postgraduate Research Scholarship (IPRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, emotion recognition using low-cost wearable sensors based on electroencephalogram and blood volume pulse has received much attention. Long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, a special type of recurrent neural networks, have been applied successfully to emotion classification. However, the performance of these sequence classifiers depends heavily on their hyperparameter values, and it is important to adopt an efficient method to ensure the optimal values. To address this problem, we propose a new framework to automatically optimize LSTM hyperparameters using differential evolution (DE). This is the first systematic study of hyperparameter optimization in the context of emotion classification. In this paper, we evaluate and compare the proposed framework with other state-of-the-art hyperparameter optimization methods (particle swarm optimization, simulated annealing, random search, and tree of Parzen estimators) using a new dataset collected from wearable sensors. Experimental results demonstrate that optimizing LSTM hyperparameters significantly improve the recognition rate of four-quadrant dimensional emotions with a 14% increase in accuracy. The best model based on the optimized LSTM classifier using the DE algorithm achieved 77.68% accuracy. The results also showed that evolutionary computation algorithms, particularly DE, are competitive for ensuring optimized LSTM hyperparameter values. Although DE algorithm is computationally expensive, it is less complex and offers higher diversity infinding optimal solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据