3.9 Article

Long-Term Follow-Up of a Phase I/II Study of ProSavin, a Lentiviral Vector Gene Therapy for Parkinson's Disease

期刊

HUMAN GENE THERAPY CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 148-155

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/humc.2018.081

关键词

gene therapy; lentiviral vector; Parkinson's disease; dopamine

资金

  1. Oxford BioMedica (UK) Ltd.
  2. ARSC Foundation
  3. NIHR
  4. University of Cambridge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease is typically treated with oral dopamine replacement therapies. However, long-term use is complicated by motor fluctuations from intermittent stimulation of dopamine receptors and off-target effects. ProSavin, a lentiviral vector based gene therapy that delivers local and continuous dopamine, was previously shown to be well tolerated in a Phase I/II first-in-human study, with significant improvements in motor behavior from baseline at 1 year. Here, patients with Parkinson's disease from the open-label trial were followed up in the long term to assess the safety and efficacy of ProSavin after bilateral injection into the putamen. Fifteen patients who were previously treated with ProSavin have been followed for up to 5 years, with some having been seen for 8 years. Eight patients received deep brain stimulation at different time points, and their subsequent assessments continued to assess safety. Ninety-six drug-related adverse events were reported (87 mild, 6 moderate, 3 severe) of which more than half occurred in the first year. The most common drug-related events were dyskinesias (33 events, 11 patients) and on-off phenomena (22 events, 11 patients). A significant improvement in the defined off Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III motor scores, compared to baseline, was seen at 2 years (mean score 29.2 vs. 38.4, n = 14, p < 0.05) and at 4 years in 8/15 patients. ProSavin continued to be safe and well tolerated in patients with Parkinson's disease. Moderate improvements in motor behavior over baseline continued to be reported in the majority of patients who could still be evaluated up to 5 years of follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据