4.8 Review

NKG2D Ligands-Critical Targets for Cancer Immune Escape and Therapy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02040

关键词

NKG2D; NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL); cellular stress response; cancer therapy; immunotherapy; post-transcriptional; regulation; post-translational regulation; shedding

资金

  1. German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF)
  2. DKFZ-MOST program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA damage, oncogene activation and excessive proliferation, chromatin modulations or oxidative stress are all important hallmarks of cancer. Interestingly, all of these abnormalities also induce a cellular stress response. By upregulating stress-induced ligands, damaged or transformed cells can be recognized by immune cells and cleared. The human genome encodes eight functional stress-induced ligands: MICA, MICB, and ULBP1-6. All of them are recognized by a single receptor, NKG2D, which is expressed on natural killer (NK) cells, cytotoxic T cells and other T cell subsets. The NKG2D ligand/NKG2D-axis is well-recognized as an important mediator of anti-tumor activity; however, patient data about the role of NKG2D ligands in immune surveillance and escape appears conflicting. As these ligands are often actively transcribed, tumor cells are urged to manipulate the expression of these ligands on post-transcriptional or post-translational level. Although our knowledge on the regulation of NKG2D ligand expression remains fragmentary, research of the past years revealed multiple cellular mechanisms that are adopted by tumor cells to reduce the expression of stress-induced ligands and therefore escape immune recognition. Here, we review the post-transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms by which NKG2D ligands are modulated in cancer cells and their impact on patient prognosis. We discuss controversies and approaches to apply our understanding of the NKG2D ligand/NKG2Daxis for cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据