4.8 Article

Bincing of soluble yeast β-glucan to human neutrophils and monocytes is complement-dependent

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00230

关键词

C3; opsonization; CR3; beta-glucans; neutrophils; monocytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immunomodulatory properties of yeast beta-1,3/1,6 glucans are mediated through their ability to be recognized by human innate immune cells. While several studies have investigated binding of opsonized and unopsonized particulate beta-glucans to human immune cells mainly via complement receptor 3 (CR3) or Dectin-1, few have focused on understanding the binding characteristics of soluble beta-glucans. Using a well-characterized, pharmaceuticalgrade, soluble yeast beta-glucan, this study evaluated and characterized the binding of soluble beta-glucan to human neutrophils and monocytes. The results demonstrated that soluble (beta-glucan bound to both human neutrophils and monocytes in a concentration-dependent and receptor-specific manner. Antibodies blocking the CD11b and CD18 chains of CR3 significantly inhibited binding to both cell types, establishing CR3 as the key receptor recognizing the soluble beta-glucan in these cells. Binding of soluble beta-glucan to human neutrophils and monocytes required serum and was also dependent on incubation time and temperature, strongly suggesting that binding was complement-mediated. Indeed, binding was reduced in heat-inactivated serum, or in serum treated with methylamine or in serum reacted with the C3-specific inhibitor compstatin. Opsonization of soluble beta-glucan was demonstrated by detection of iC3b, the complement opsonin on beta-glucan-bound cells, as well as by the direct binding of iC3b to beta-glucan in the absence of cells. Binding of beta-glucan to cells was partially inhibited by blockade of the alternative pathway of complement, suggesting that the C3 activation amplification step mediated by this pathway also contributed to binding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据