4.8 Review

New lives given by cell death: macrophage differentiation following their encounter with apoptotic leukocytes during the resolution of inflammation

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00004

关键词

resolution of inflammation; macrophage differentiation; efferocytosis; pro-resolving lipid mediators

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [534/09]
  2. Nutricia Research Foundationl
  3. Marc Rich Foundation
  4. National Institute of Health [R01 GM38765, P01 GM095467]
  5. Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monocytes that migrate into tissues during inflammatory episodes and differentiate to macrophages were previously classified as classically (M1) or alternatively (M2) activated macrophages, based on their exposure to different fate-determining mediators. These macrophage subsets display distinct molecular markers and differential functions. At the same time, studies from recent years found that the encounter of apoptotic leukocytes with macrophages leads to the clearance of this cellular debris by the macrophages, while concomitantly reprogramming/immune-silencing the macrophages. While some of the features of M2 differentiation, such as arginase-1 (murine) and 15-lipoxygenases (human and murine) expression, were also displayed by macrophages following the engulfment of apoptotic cells, it was not clear whether apoptotic cells can be regarded as an M2-like differentiating signal. In this manuscript we review the recent information regarding the impact of apoptotic cells on macrophage phenotype changes in molecular terms. We will focus on recent evidence for the in vivo existence of distinct pro-resolving macrophages and the role of apoptotic cells, specialized lipid mediators, and glucocorticoids in their generation. Consequently, we will suggest that these pro-resolving CD11b(low) macrophages have meta-morphed from M2-like macrophages, and modulated their protein profile to accommodate the changes in their function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据