4.6 Article

Paclitaxel- and lapatinib-loaded lipopolymer micelles overcome multidrug resistance in prostate cancer

期刊

DRUG DELIVERY AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 420-428

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13346-011-0042-2

关键词

Lipopolymer; Prostate cancer; Lapatinib; Paclitaxel; Multidrug resistance

资金

  1. Idea Award from the Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-10-1-0969]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paclitaxel is a potent chemotherapeutic agent for treating refractory prostate cancer. However, its prolonged treatment develops multidrug resistance. Since lapatinib interacts with and inhibits P-gp activity, our objective was to determine whether the combination therapy of these two drugs can synergistically treat resistant prostate cancer. Our recently synthesized lipopolymer, poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(2-methyl-2-carboxylpropylene carbonate-graft-dodecanol) (PEG-PCD), was used to efficiently load both drugs into PEG-PCD micelles since they are hydrophobic. Lapatinib inhibited P-gp function but not its expression. Co-treatment of DU145-TXR cells with 0.5 mu M paclitaxel and 5 mu M lapatinib resulted in up to 138-fold reversal compared to paclitaxel alone. These formulations killed almost 70% and 80% of DU145-TXR cells when 0.5 mu M paclitaxel was combined with lapatinib at a dose of 1 and 5 mu M, respectively, while monotherapy had no effect. Combination therapy induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at mitotic phase. Xenograft tumor growth in athymic nude mice was significantly regressed when PEG-PCD micelles carrying lapatinib and paclitaxel were given intravenously twice a week. Furthermore, this combination therapy synergistically decreased antiangiogenic activity compared to the control or their monotherapy. In conclusion, lipopolymeric micelles carrying lapatinib and paclitaxel have the potential to treat resistant prostate cancer and can successfully deliver drugs to tumors while minimizing toxic effects associated with solubilizing agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据