4.6 Review

Bioreactor design for perfusion-based, highly vascularized organ regeneration

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2012.12.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS) Engineering into Medicine Mini-Sabbatical Program - CTSA Award [UL1RR025741]
  2. Zell Family Foundation
  3. Excellence in Academic Medicine Act through the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services
  4. Northwestern Memorial Foundation Dixon Translational Research Grants Initiative
  5. Chemistry of Life Processes Chairman's Innovation Award
  6. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
  7. American Liver Foundation Liver Scholar Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The production of bioartificial or laboratory-grown organs is a growing field centered on developing replacement organs and tissues to restore body function and providing a potential solution to the shortage of donor organs for transplantation. With the entry of engineered planar tissues, such as bladder and trachea, into clinical studies, an increasing focus is being given to designing complex, three-dimensional solid organs. As tissues become larger, thicker and more complex, the vascular network becomes crucial for supplying nutrients and maintaining viability and growth of the neo-organ. Perfusion decellularization, the process of removing cells from an entire organ, leaves the matrix of the vascular network intact. Organ engineering requires a delicate process of decellularization, sterilization, reseeding with appropriate cells, and organ maturation and stimulation to ensure optimal development. The design of bioreactors to facilitate this sequence of events has been refined to the extent that some bioartificial organs grown in these systems have been transplanted into recipient animals with sustained, though limited, function. This review focuses on the state-of-art in bioreactor development for perfusion-based bioartificial organs and highlights specific design components in need of further refinement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据