4.7 Article

Random and direct mutagenesis to enhance protein secretion in Ashbya gossypii

期刊

BIOENGINEERED
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 322-331

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/bioe.24653

关键词

Ashbya gossypii; random mutagenesis; increased protein production; GAS1 gene deletion

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal
  2. project AshByofactory [PTDC/EBB-EBI/101985/2008-FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-00971, SFRH/BD/30229/2006]
  3. MIT-Portugal Program Grant [SFRH/BD/39112/2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the general secretion ability of the biotechnologically relevant fungus Ashbya gossypii, random mutagenesis with ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) was performed. The selection and screening strategy followed revealed mutants with improved secretion of heterologous Trichoderma reesei endoglucanase I (EGI), native a-amylase and/or native beta-glucosidase. One mutant, S436, presented 1.4- to 2-fold increases in all extracellular enzymatic activities measured, when compared with the parent strain, pointing to a global improvement in protein secretion. Three other mutants exhibited 2- to 3-fold improvements in only one (S397, B390) or two (S466) of the measured activities. A targeted genetic approach was also followed. Two homologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAS1, AgGAS1A (AGL351W) and AgGAS1B (AGL352W), were deleted from the A. gossypii genome. For both copies deletion, a new antibiotic marker cassette conferring resistance to phleomycin, BLE3, was constructed. GAS1 encodes an beta-1,3-glucanosyltransglycosylase involved in cell wall assembly. Higher permeability of the cell wall was expected to increase the protein secretion capacity. However, total protein secreted to culture supernatants and secreted EGI activity did not increase in the Aggas1A Delta mutants. Deletion of the AgGAS1B copy affected cellular morphology and resulted in severe retardation of growth, similarly to what has been reported for GAS1-defficient yeast. Thus, secretion could not be tested in these mutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据