4.7 Article

Host cell protein dynamics in recombinant CHO cells Impacts from harvest to purification and beyond

期刊

BIOENGINEERED
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 288-291

出版社

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/bioe.23382

关键词

host cell protein; Chinese hamster ovary (CHO); mammalian cell culture; downstream processing; protein A chromatography; monoclonal antibody; proteomics

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L002310/1, BB/G010307/1, BB/G010358/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G010307/1, BB/G010358/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. BBSRC [BB/G010358/1, BB/G010307/1, BB/L002310/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the production of recombinant protein products, such as monoclonal antibodies, manufacturers must demonstrate clearance of host cell impurities and contaminants to appropriate levels prior to use in the clinic. These include host cell DNA and RNA, product related contaminants such as aggregates, and importantly host cell proteins (HCPs). Despite the importance of HCP removal, the identity and dynamics of these proteins during cell culture and downstream processing (DSP) are largely unknown. Improvements in technologies such as SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry alongside the gold standard technique of ELISA has allowed semi-quantification of the total HCPs present. However, only recently have techniques been utilized in order to identify those HCPs present and align this with the development of approaches to monitor the dynamics of HCPs during both fermentation and downstream processing. In order to enable knowledge based decisions with regards to improving HCP clearance it is vital to identify potential problematic HCPs on a cell line and product specific basis. Understanding the HCP dynamics will in the future help provide a platform to rationally manipulate and engineer and/or select suitable recombinant CHO cell lines and downstream processing steps to limit problematic HCPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据